Healthcare Simulation-Based Education (SBE) represents a paradigm shift in contemporary pedagogical practices that transcends the mere reframing of clinical experiences. SBE stands as an evolving educational methodology, synergistically entwined with the rapid advancement of emerging technologies. This dynamic fusion not only enriches traditional educational approaches but also fosters innovation across all experiential learning modalities. This HealthySimulation.com article by Lorenzo Saenz, MSN, RN, CHSE, will discuss the five R’s of clinical simulation education: rigor, recognition, reflection, remediation, and reassessment.
In the rapidly ever-evolving landscape of educational methodologies, educators often find themselves required to navigate a labyrinth of best practices. Amidst this flux, Simulation-Based Education emerges as a beacon of promise that offers a pathway towards enhanced learning outcomes. Through this context, the author endeavors insight into a robust methodology that has yielded remarkable and dynamic results within the realm of student nurse education.
A deeper delve into the intricacies of SBE unraveled a multifaceted potential to revolutionize the healthcare educational landscape. Through this exploration, the transformative power of simulation proved to be a catalyst for experiential learning. Simulation proved to be an excellent space to combine prior learning from the cognitive domain with prior learning from the kinesthetic domain.
The First R: Rigor
The meticulous plan and execution of SBE programs epitomize the foundational phase where the pursuit of rigor stands as a paramount objective, particularly under the guidance of the instructional designer. Indeed, the standardized rigor serves as an indispensable companion to articulate learning objectives and forms an inseparable tandem in educational design. To grasp the significance of this assertion, one must introspectively query: ‘What purpose do learning outcomes serve if they lack the scaffolding necessary for attainment, while simultaneously presenting novel challenges to learners?’
At Western New Mexico University (WNMU), the standardization of rigor within the simulation methodologies finds the anchor in the concept of the Performance Reference Point (PRP). Conceptually akin to a complex puzzle awaiting resolution by the simulation participant, the PRP embodies a dynamic interplay of temporal progression (X-axis) and the critical performance metrics (Y-axis) essential for puzzle resolution. Each simulation scenario commences with a cue, a subtle prompt which signals the inception of the problem-solving process. Upon cue recognition, participants engage in further inquiry or assessment that culminates in the formulation of a strategic course of action intended to prompt intervention by the student nurse.
As the simulation unfolds, the PRP facilitates a structured approach towards intervention, fostering communication regarding the rationale behind interventions and their method of execution. This iterative process allows for refinement and reevaluation of intervention efficacy, ensuring a comprehensive learning experience.
The algorithmic framework of a Performance Reference Point delineates a structured pathway encompassing cue recognition, strategic intervention, and iterative refinement, thereby underscoring the meticulous orchestration inherent in our simulation methodologies: Cue, Recognition, Assessment, Intervention, Communication, and Reassessment.
The Second R: Recognition
With the capacity to delineate the rigor of a simulation established, the simulation educator must lighten the repercussions of failure to meet established benchmarks. One of the most flagrant errors would entail a participant’s failure to discern the cue that results in a lack of any ensuing action. Such an oversight would culminate in the assignment of zero points along the “Y” axis of performance evaluation. Subsequently, pertinent inquiries would arise in regards to the extent to which the student engaged with the simulator or standardized patient in a manner characterized by safety and appropriateness. Fundamental to this engagement is the requisite articulation of interventions, minimally by oral presentation or preferably through Electronic Healthcare Record documentation. Next, the participants must revisit the patient and reassess the efficacy of their interventions. The identification of student errors by the facilitator, therefore, operates along dual axes: temporal and performance-based. This multifaceted approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation that encompasses both the execution of tasks and the temporal dynamics inherent in-patient care simulations.
The Third R: Reflection – The Important Part!
Upon completion of a simulation, the effectiveness of various debriefing methods becomes paramount, with the central focus for facilitation of a Socratic process that affords students the opportunity to discern any lapses in judgment or challenges encountered during kinesthetic tasks. The priority is placed on the cultivation of an introspective environment conducive to reflective learning rather than a singular debriefing approach.
WNMU adopted a nuanced approach, amalgamating elements of the Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) methodology with the analytical lens provided by the Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Takeaways and Incorporation (SWOTI) framework. This hybrid model enables a comprehensive synthesis across performance domains that encompasses decision-making, technical proficiency, communication efficacy, resource management, leadership acumen, situational awareness, and collaborative teamwork. By encouraging participants to categorize these aspects as strengths, weaknesses, or observations, simulation faculty establish a robust template for post-simulation reflective assignments.
The overarching objective of these reflective assignments is to foster a degree of professional detachment that enables students to objectively scrutinize their performance and identify avenues for enhancement. Moreover, this structured approach empowers individuals to formulate actionable strategies aimed for performance optimization. Through immediate personalization of improvement strategies, which encompasses both cognitive comprehension and kinesthetic refinement, this methodology endeavors to instigate meaningful and tangible progress in participants’ skill sets.
View the HealthySimulation.com Webinar How to Implement INACSL’s Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice Into Your Program to learn more!
The Fourth R: Remediation
Within the domain of kinesthetic learning, students often embark upon their journey of remediation. This journey typically commences due to either a medication error or a deficiency in comprehending the implementation or execution of a particular skill. Central to our approach is the concerted effort to destigmatize mistakes. In the realm of simulation, errors are not mere blunders but rather invaluable insights into the cognitive processes at play even before a student interacts with a real patient. Experience has taught the WNMU simulation faculty that these mistakes seldom occur in isolation within a simulation setting. More often than not, they stem from misunderstandings that originate in didactic classes or skill labs that culminates in a deviation from the desired performance reference point.
Much like the reflective process, remediation is a highly individualized endeavor. To facilitate this process, a dedicated space known as the Practice Observation and Development of Skill Sets (PODSS) was established. This specialized cubicle is equipped with task trainers, a pad device offering step-by-step video instructions, and a laptop computer for documentation purposes. Within PODSS, students are presented with a myriad of skills and remedial techniques tailored to address specific performance reference points. This multifaceted approach ensures that students have access to diverse avenues to address and rectify deficiencies within their skill sets.
The Fifth R: Reassessment
Upon completion of student-directed remediation, the clinical simulation faculty must ensure the learner has demonstrable improvement in the areas identified through reflective practice. This necessitates the implementation of another simulation session to meticulously analyze the student’s performance. This underscores the crucial focus lies in the analysis of the performance rather than the assignment of a grade. The essence of this analysis lies in discerning advancements in safety and proficiency, which fosters the student’s continued progression within the program while upholding the requisite performance standards essential for clinical practice.
The utilization of performance reference points to establish the rigor of simulations offers a remarkable advantage. This allows for the cultivation of similar cognitive processes without replicating the exact experiences of prior simulations. Key parameters such as cue recognition, assessment, treatment, communication, and reassessment remain consistent, ensures a comprehensive evaluation framework. However, the specific implementation strategies may vary that prevents mere replication of previous experiences. For instance, if a previous simulation revealed a deficiency in kinesthetic skills, providing the student with an opportunity to apply similar skills in a different clinical scenario offers a targeted approach to skill enhancement that fosters a deeper understanding of varied patient presentations and etiologies. This approach not only enriches the learning experience but also cultivates adaptive expertise essential for clinical proficiency and lifelong learning.
The utilization of a conceptual framework anchored in the five fundamental principles encapsulated by the “R’s” – namely, relevance, rigor, responsiveness, reflexivity, and resilience – has proven pivotal in the endeavors to effectively narrow the chasm between theoretical knowledge and practical application within the confines of our rural nursing community. This methodological approach not only underscores the significance of aligning academic discourse with real-world exigencies but also underscores the imperative to foster a symbiotic relationship between scholarly inquiry and on-the-ground implementation. With conscientious adherence to these principles, simulation educators are empowered to cultivate a dynamic interface wherein theoretical insights seamlessly interface with the intricate realities of rural healthcare provision that engenders a more holistic and efficacious educational and professional milieu for both students and practitioners alike.
Learn More About Reflective Thinking in Healthcare Simulation!
